View Single Post
  #312   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
J. Clarke[_2_] J. Clarke[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,366
Default Welcome To Big Time Politics

In article , markem618
@hotmail.com says...

On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 22:59:02 -0500, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article , markem618
says...

On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 17:14:32 -0500, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article , markem618
says...

On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:17:02 -0500, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

The problem is that you can't just say "some people should not own
firearms" without defining which people in a manner that is legally
enforcable. So how would you define this prohibited class?

I am not prohibiting anyone, just say some people should not have
them.

If you're not in favor of preventing such persons from having them then
to what purpose are you saying this?

Why not?


I'm sorry but "why not" is not a statement of purpose.


This from someone who jumps in just to be arguing.


Why are you getting defensive?