Han wrote:

There IS a line to be drawn somewhere.

Here we have a case of carnage involving a large-capacity magazine.
You would outlaw these devices because there was ONE event in
recorded history of their misuse. In essence, you would penalize
thousands to prevent a VERY rare event.

A pitiful mindset indeed.

Indeed a line to be drawn. Ther is no real use for the large capacity
magazines other than to spray many rounds real fast. Ergo, either
prohibit or limit their sale. Indiscriminate distribution is wrong.
It really is that simple.

What use is a baby?

It may be difficult, but wrap your mind around this concept: When it comes
to guns, "need" or "real use" or "hunting" has no traction with the gun
community.

The only thing that counts is "want."