On Feb 2, 11:35*am, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
Man at B&Q wrote:
On Feb 2, 10:28 am, Gib Bogle wrote:
On 2/02/2011 11:08 p.m., harry wrote:

Why Jeremy is a nobber.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hype_about_Hydrogen
Yes, it's a half-baked idea.

I stopped reading after "nor will its use reduce global warming,
because of the cost and greenhouse gases generated during production"

Why? that is, in fact, entirely correct, unless you know a way (other
than nuclear

Ding!

It's the blanket dismissal, without considering all the options, in
the first three paragraphs that makes the rest of the article suspect.
I've got better things to do.

Most wiki articles that don't agree with peoples prejudices seem that way..

Nothing to do with my prejudices, just sloppy or ill-informed writing.

MBQ