On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 18:27:49 -0500, "Upscale" wrote:


wrote in message
I suspect that the manufacturers would have balked at any reasonable
offer.
Facts that are not in evidence.

History has shown those facts in evidence ~ especially on the North American
continent where greed and competition know no bounds.

More leftist claptrap.

That's the point. SawStop's inventor tried to make that happen. You
apparently think that's a good thing.

Maybe Leon is referring to a truly working safety device as being a good
thing and not as you prefer to believe Steve Gass trying to force the issue.

Two completely different issues, though even a moron like you should know
that.

And even if Gass was trying to for the adoption of the Sawstop, it's a
working safety device.

There is no "if" about it. Whether it is a working safety device is
completely irrelevant to the argument, though even a moron like you should
know that.

Whatever way gets it to market fastest is a good
thing as far as I'm concerned.

Even if that destroys the market?

It seems all you're concerned with is not
being coerced in any way to use the device despite its benefits.

More lies, from a leftist loser.

I certainly wish them all the luck. I know I won't be buying one.

Of course you wouldn't buy one. You'd rebel against anything and everything
that forces you to be safe.

Another lie. I looked at them. I couldn't justify *TWICE* the price of my
Unisaw.

You must go nuts having to wear a seat belt,
drive the speed limit and stop at red lights. You far to concerned with
yourself to realize that almost *every* safety mandate out there benefits
*everybody* when it prevents you from getting hurt.

More garbage from life's loser.