wrote in message ...


His point was NOT is not claiming how MUCH to adjust the numbers as to
the "related"...just that there IS an adjustment to be made.

Without knowing how much of an adjustment it's kind of pointless, what if
it's .05%?

The fact
is that it's kinda like when MADD "cites" teen alcohol related
accidents...if a PASSENGER in the OTHER car was drunk, MADD will still
use it as a teen+alcohol=BAD things accident.

Their shift to being almost a temperance organization is what caused the
group's founder to leave. They've become one of those self-contained
bureaucracy-religions that serves itself more than a public need. They
absorb a lot of the money they raise too and get poor grades from
organizations that rate the efficiency of charities. Too bad, they did good
work once upon a time.