"Leon" wrote in message
Some people get a little insight into something that they know little
about and rebel. Then they pay out the nose for insurance not realizing
that they have cut their nose off to spite their face.

It's a natural act for anybody to rebel against something that attempts to
force them to comply. Most *every* argument I've seen against using the
Sawstop has at one point or another derided Steve Gass from trying to get
the Sawstop technology mandated. And, their hatred of that attempt has
caused them to dismiss the Sawstop as a device they will not use, despite
its safety benefits.

In other words, it's all right for them to be safe, just as long as it's
their idea and not someone else's.