View Single Post
  #28   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,alt.security.alarms
zek zek is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 165
Default Automatic fire sprinklers

On Jan 11, 9:03*am, wrote:
On Jan 11, 8:09*am, Smitty Two wrote:



In article
,


*Evan wrote:
On Jan 10, 11:51*pm, mleuck wrote:


The issue to me isn't if they work well but that federal, state or
local governments shouldn't be mandating them. if the builder or
customer wants them that's another story


LOL... *And why not ?


If something can save lives why not require it... *Especially
out there in the "heartland of America" where volunteer fire
protection rules the day...


Smoke detectors = required
Carbon monoxide detectors = required


automatic fire sprinklers = requirement coming soon


Not just the public safety folks, but normal people are
starting to see the pattern of people dying in small home
fires as opposed to large multi-unit dwellings which have
had the requirement to be sprinkler protected for a while
now...


How many people were electrocuted in the bathroom
at home before GFCI's became a requirement ?


~~ Evan


Thanks for your previous posts with good info about how these sprinkler
systems work. But I'm completely opposed to laws designed to protect me
from myself. I have smoke detectors because I think they're a good idea,
but I don't have CO detectors, and I sure as hell don't want anyone
telling me I need a sprinkler system.


As for GFCIs, absolute bull****. The number of electrocutions in the
home, in the U.S. is vanishingly small. I researched this a few years
ago for an a.h.r. discussion, and IIRC, about ten times as many people
die by falling down while walking on level ground. A law requiring
installation of tens of millions of devices in order to keep ~20 people
per year alive is absolutely, positively insane.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Whether you think requiring sprinklers in new homes is a good idea or
not, I think it's positively STUPID to pass this law in PA now, in the
middle of the worst housing recession since the Depression. * Sort
of like passing national health insurance, imposing all kinds of
uncertaintity and new costs on businesses during the worst recession.
They can't sell houses now, so let's make them cost even more....


All the new homes I see built are for the rich. Screw them.
Contractors
don't want to build cheap houses. They make more money on the big
ones.
All the poorer people have to settle for used stuff. The people that
don't like national
health insurance, don't have many friends that need it.

greg