"Pete C." wrote in
ter.com:


JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

"RicodJour" wrote in message
.
.. On Jan 10, 12:04 pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
harry wrote:
I see that six people have been killed by some loon in Arizona.
I feel really sorry for that poor little girl and her family.
Some judge killed too but who likes lawyers anyway?

As for Gabrielle Giffords I hear she was a gun advocate. Big
friend of the Palin nut?

Well there's, a good outcome at least. If still capable of
cognisant thought when/if she recovers, I wonder if she'll have a
change of heart.

I notice that no -one was able to "defend themselves" with guns
and the gunman was disarmed by a little old lady and a couple of
passing youths who sat on his head.

Sick half wits you gun loving lot are.

What happened to the poor folks in Tuscon was regrettable indeed.
Our hearts
go out to them.

Still, it's the price we must pay so that our ability to defend
ourselves remains available. Here's an interview with a citizen
carrying a weapon who
helped subdue the
shooter.http://thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/01...k/think-concea
l-carry-d...

As for Giffords being a gun advocate, hardly. The NRA rated her
"D+" (up from an "F" during her tenure as a state legislator). Of
course a D+ rating
in Arizona would be a flogging offense in the UK.

Ancient bumper-sticker:
"If Vince Foster had had a gun, he'd be alive today."

Ah, yes, nothing like starting off the New Year with the same
simplistic thinking for which you're famous.

Scenario: Wacko in a crowd with a gun starts shooting. People all
around him have guns, too, and they start shooting at the wacko. How
many bystanders get shot by the people in the crowd defending
themselves?
Answer: Too many.
Moral: The wacko with the gun will always "win".

============

This is all theoretical unless you have some idea of how many people
in the crowd were carrying guns, but did not use them. We already
know of at least one.

I eagerly await your further information.

It's the same old tired and utterly baseless "wild west" fantasy of
the anti gun kooks. A fantasy since there has never been a single such
incident anywhere in the US, including all the states that have had
concealed carry for decades.


well,that's because the "progressives" don't operate based on fact and
reason,but on "feelings" and imaginations.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com