On Jan 7, 12:30*am, harry wrote:
On Jan 6, 4:47*pm, Harry K wrote:





On Jan 6, 12:57*am, harry wrote:

On Jan 5, 4:32*pm, Harry K wrote:

On Jan 5, 12:17*am, harry wrote:

On Jan 5, 4:52*am, Harry K wrote:

On Jan 4, 8:17*pm, Robert Neville wrote:

DerbyDad03 wrote:
Is there really no noticeable difference between 40 PSI and 60 PSI?

There is for me. We're on a well with a storage tank located about 250' away and
100' below the house grade. A 5 stage booster pump set to output 65 psi at the
tank level results in about 40 psi at the entrance to the first floor of the
house, less after distribution throughout the first floor and even less on the
second floor.

Would love to have 60psi at the house entrance, but that would involve replacing
the booster pump with a very expensive 8 stage booster pump or installing a
second booster at the house.

Something does not compute. *Psi of 65 should only be 22 psi at 100'
rise...some less than that after the loss through 250' of pipe.

Harry K

0.4336 psi in a foot head as I remember. We are on "bars" now in
Europe.
Frictional pipe losses depend on flow on any particular system.
No flow=no loss.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And no flow=no water being used so your point is? *Static pressure is
pretty immaterial in a water system.

Harry K- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Static pressure is that due to the hieght of the reservoir above your
house. It runs the whole system. *Pressure drop is due to the
frictional losses in the pipework due to water flowing through it.
The point is that a restrictor creates a pressure drop that depends on
the volume of water going through it.
It is an additional frictional loss, not a pressure reducer per se.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

??? Do you have a point that is unknown to everyone already? *To make
it clear. *I know what a PRV vavle is and what it does.

BTW the PRV does reduce pressure even at static. *Case in point was my
town down in a canyon. *They built a new reservoir up on the rim.
Blew fittings all over town _even when no water was being used_. *Also
my mothers house when I installed the PRV there. *Reduced pressure to
55 psi _static_.

I repeat - static pressure is pretty meaningless *in the operation of
a water system. *It is what it does _dynamically_ that counts.

My original system here was from a commuity well over a 1/4 mile
away. *Static (30/50) *was just fine, dynamic wouldn't run an impulse
sprinkler.

Harry K- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you need to go an read a few books. You are in cloud cuckoo
land and in need of education.
If your system was from a well, there would be
*(a) Elevated storage tanks filled by pumps down/adjacent to the
wells. Giving static pressure. I assume water runs downhill even in
America. Or maybe you don't know this.
Or
(b) A pumped pressure system. Less likely as no electricity instantly
means no water..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

WTH is that mish mash supposed to mean?

Simple. Pump fills pressure tank no matter where it is. Pump shuts
off at cut-off pressure. That is the STATIC pressure. Open valve
and water flows with DYNAMIC pressure dropping. It does that whether
it is a pumped sytem or feeding from a reservoir. What the DYNAMIC
pressure is determines hwo well the system works.

You are talking to a peson who has fooled with and cussed these
systems for 60 years including being the unpaid maintenance man for
our community well. No longer, I had a well drilled here to get off
that community one because I wanted otu of the maintenance bit AND
WANTED A DYNAMIC PRESSURE tha would run a sprinkler.

You keep coming up with weird posts that really say nothing.

I repeat again: Static pressure is not the criteria for system
operation. It is a beginning point and that is all.

If you care to refute it go ahead but all you are doing is dancing
around it.
Harry K