notbob wrote:

On 2011-01-04, Pete C. wrote:

"feel" both in use and in documentation....

Yeah. We get it.

They "feel" really "real". There's nothing like the "real" "feel" of
a really "real" feeling OS. If one can't really "feel" how "real" a
really "real" feeling OS "feels", just how "real" feeling could it
possibley "feel". I mean, really.

nb

No, clearly you don't get it. I said nothing about feeling "real", I
said non-professional, there is a very big difference. Non-professional
is inconsistent documentation, inconsistent command line options, silly
utility names and the like. The professional feeling OSes have
absolutely consistent documentation across all versions and layered
products, consistent command line parameters across the OS and all
utilities and rational descriptive utility names.