On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:57:13 -0800, "DGDevin" wrote:

wrote in message ...

Well, we could "absorb" another 9/11 every few months, like Obummer
suggests.
...or we can try to kill the *******s and keep them there.

Did the Taliban plan and execute 9/11? No? Then provided they aren't
hosting Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, why would them being back in power lead to
another 9/11? Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda are happily operating in Pakistan this
very day, and Pakistan is supposed to be an ally, so why all the blood being
wasted in Afghanistan?

The Taliban refused to turn over Bin Laden. They were, in fact, supporting
him. Oops. We should lay waste to that area of Pakistan, too. We should
have long ago.

Okay, North Korea withdrew from the
Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 2003 and tested its first nuke in
Oct.,
2006. Do you happen to recall who was President on both those occasions?

Does it really matter?

It would matter a whole bunch to you if a Democrat had been President,
wouldn't it.

Nice change of subject, but it's irrelevant.

Pray tell, what hard-nosed, no-nonsense steps did Two-Gun Tex take to make
North Korea bitterly regret they had decided to go nuclear?

None. That was part of his problem. The solution was simple (still is),
but
no one wants to go there.

Are you volunteering to lead the amphibious landing? Or do you just want to
start pitching nukes?

You really are stupid, aren't you. Simply give nukes (or technology) to
Japan. Problem over.

The obvious doesn't need a lot of words.

If it's so obvious you should be able to articulate a reasoned argument in
support; failing to do so suggests a slogan rather than a rational position.

It's clear enough that you're stupid. Not many words needed.