On 12/5/2010 5:03 AM, harry wrote:
On Dec 4, 5:05 pm, The Daring
wrote:
On 12/4/2010 10:26 AM, harry wrote:





On Dec 4, 10:25 am, The Daring
wrote:
On 12/4/2010 2:05 AM, harry wrote:

On Dec 3, 1:11 pm, wrote:
harry wrote:

Anything written X thousand years ago be desert ragheads is suspect.
But oh, I seem to remember you consider it to be "good evidence". I
bet you're a creationist too.

I agree that anything written X thousand years ago to be suspect, along with
anything written yesterday or at any time between.

The test is whether what was written is sufficiently strong, standing alone,
to compel a rational mind of the probable truth of the assertion made.

Heh Heh. And you claim to have been a cop.

Yep. I even put people in jail whose actions violated some written rule I
thought absurd.

For example, I would have had to arrest this fellow, although I'd be on his
side.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXy1iiQgOAM
Hardly rates as a sworn statement.
Good one Heh Heh.
However more "Hollywood" fiction. I hope you don't base all life's
descisions on this sort of stuff.

Harry, what's happened to you? Are you humor impaired now?

TDD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony
Americans don't understand Brit humour.


What? I love Monty Python!

TDD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We have a special dumbed down version for Yanks ;-)

"Oh I'm a lumberjack and that's OK....." :-)

TDD