harry wrote in
:

On Dec 1, 12:42*am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Don Klipstein wrote:

*Then why are not homosexuals barred from the militaries of 22 of
the 28 NATO nations, Russia, Israel, Colombia, Japan, New Zealand,
Philipines, Serbia, Malta, South Africa, Taiwan, Argentina,
Australia, Finland, Ireland, Peru, Uraguay and Switzerland?

*In 22 of these nations, homosexuals are allowed to serve openly in
the military, and 12 other countries as of specific dates lifted
bans or specifically allowed homosexuals to serve, according to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militar...of_homosexuals

Uh, the United States is not Russia, Israel, Colombia, Japan, New
Zealand
,
Philipines, Serbia, Malta, South Africa, Taiwan, Argentina,
Australia, Finland, Ireland, Peru, Uraguay or Switzerland.

And, with the exception of Israel, none of the countries you mention
have had a war with anybody since the issue became notorious. Except,
of cours
e,
Serbia, but they lost. Israel is a special case; there women fight in
com
bat
roles, the country has a conscript army, and the religious Israelis -
who would be compelled to strangle homosexuals to death - do not
serve in the IDF.

Don't forget Argentina and Russia. Did they lose because of faggots?

I may not be able to figure out why anyone would want to put their
Johnson in a ******** but - faggots? Is that necessary?

Your voice is your choice I guess. Long as I don't participate to that
extent.