In message , "dennis@home"
writes


"geoff" wrote in message
...
In message , "dennis@home"
writes


"geoff" wrote in message
...
In message , "dennis@home"
writes


"geoff" wrote in message
...

Would you like to actually admit that you are wrong here?

No, but I will if you paste the link so I can check the source, I
wouldn't trust *you* to tell me the time.


There you go SFB

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/vat/managing/...ng/reclaim.htm

now you can admit you are wrong, you stupid retard

OK.

Was that "OK, yes, I was wrong "?





However it does raise an interesting point..

someone who is not VAT registered like TMH would pay VAT if he
supplies the goods..
Someone who gets TMH to buy the goods and then claims back the goods
is assisting TMH in avoiding registering for VAT..
however he does this at a cost.. he loses all rights as a consumer
if the goods are bad.

It is no different from someone buying a boiler and asking an
installer to fit it for him

If the goods are faulty, he still has his rights as a consumer

Of course its different.
He has to get someone to fix it and then claim back the costs from the
supplier rather than telling TMH to fix it.
If TMH didn't supply it then TMH could just say no as he had fulfilled
his obligation and then the customer has to find someone else.


If you had a clue about business, an example like this cannot be
construed as avoiding VAt registration, unless there is PROOF of
collusion to evade registration (e.g. A letter stating words to that
effect

Of course its avoiding it,

Not in the evasive sense that you are implying

who said that it was wrong to do so?

You were implying it

Do you have a guilty feeling?

I am VAT registered, I have been for 18 years

I've had a VAT visit, no problems, It's left to the accountant


Oh look you have accidentally snipped the bit where I asked you to
confirm that you were wrong

Could you please confirm that you were wrong on the subject of what you
can claim against VAT not directly attributable to what you are selling
?

A simple "yes, I was wrong" would suffice



--
geoff