On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:43:20 -0500, Swingman wrote:

On 11/3/2010 1:39 PM, wrote:


IME, and it often happens that, the more contractual diarrhea used in
trying to protect yourself against all eventualities, the more you
expose your intent to adverse interpretation in a court of law.


Where there is ambiguity in a contract, the ambiguity must be
resolved against the interest of the author of the contract.

Apprectiated this thread -- as a contractor and as an occasional
lurker.


Ken in Calgary.