"Stormin Mormon" wrote in message
...

Without the Bush tax cuts, we'd have a sluggish economy like now.

Conveniently ignoring that for most of Clinton's time in office the economy
was doing pretty good. Growth averaged 4%, median family income increased
$6,000, unemployment was the lowest in 30 years. How come a smart fella
like you didn't notice any of that?

Deficits are caused by liberals spending more than the revenue. Please
do not blame tax payers for deficits. Deficits are caused by spending.

What about Bush's deficits? The federal debt doubled while he was in
office, most of that time with a Repub Congress, remember? Could it just be
possible that tax cuts at a time of increased spending also produces
deficits? Or is that some kind of tricky liberal doublespeak and you know
better than to believe it even if you can't say why?