View Single Post
  #136   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
dennis@home dennis@home is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,369
Default OT Here is an example of pseudo science.



"ThinAirDesigns" wrote in message
...
Me:
"A" is true (there is usable power in slowing the wind)
and
"B" is true (a prop can be used to slow the wind)
and
"C" is true (slowing the wind provides enough energy to turn the prop)


where is the violation of natural law?



@dennis@home
Because you don't do all three.


Ok, this may be progress. It appears that you have no problem with
"A" nor with "B", but you can't agree with "C" -- you do not agree
that the slowing the wind provides enough energy to turn the prop.

Before I go on, can you confirm that I understand you correctly?
Thanks


I don't agree that you are slowing the real wind.