On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:17:12 -0500, Don Foreman
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:42:56 -0700 (PDT), rangerssuck
wrote:


That is such complete bull****, Don. You're comparing a successful,
self-sufficient person who may, at some point in the future, receive
Medicare benefits to someone who "works the system."

Self sufficiency goes a bit beyond producing one's own electricity.
The annual contributions to medicare and FICA for those who earn a
living are considerably higher than their electric bills.

"continues to be entirely self-sufficient" - don foreman

Now *that* guy sounds likes he's got it all figured out!

If he is indeed successfully self-sufficient

Hey, weasel, maybe you should check with don foreman to see exactly
how self-sufficient I am.

, then he won't draw
support later from the system he's not contributing to now (and hasn't
for years) and hats off to him.

Just a thought... perhaps the hat doffing could be postponed until
when and if necessary, instead of spending so much time on speculative
smearing. In the meantime, if you're going to be judgmental, shouldn't
you be directing your ire at the people who are *already* proven
leechers? Know anybody like that?

ANYONE who collects social security or medicare is "riding on the
backs" of the current contributors. So what's your point?

The point is that there must be current contributors for the system to
work.

Hmm, so since *you're* already collecting, and haven't provided any
proof that your benefits thus far haven't already exceeded your
contributions, you figured it made sense to crack the whip on the
"entirely self-sufficient" who "might" someday collect! Anticipating
your usual go-to attempt at distraction, whatever happened to your
description of *exactly* which part of the constitution you defended
against whom?

Anyway, you're the sole admitted volunteer for "the great cull", which
according to thousands of assurances from general gummy, will be
finished "within 2 years". Not to mention his dozens of detailed
descriptions of my imminent death, without a single word of dispute
from you. Therefore, doesn't your sudden concern about my long-term
leeching prospects undercut your leader's credibility a tad? guffaw
Are you bucking for a court martial? Besides, surely you nitwits
aren't gonna' go waaaaay out to my "remote hide" to kill me, and then
walk away from the windfall of my assets, right?

People who collect that didn't previously contribute to support
those before them are parasitically working the system as much as AFDC
mothers who prolifically pop progeny to get the cheese checks.

And there we have it. The "entirely self-sufficient" guy = welfare
mom! A few more posts and I'll probably be related to Kevin Bacon as
well.

Now, where are those photos of *your* hide? Surely it's much nicer
than the wheeled "mansions" you were going on about yesterday. You
remember them, right? The ones you were inviting others to look up.
How about a side-by-side comparison of yours, and the "best domicile
in Kingman" that you were telling us about?

Wayne