On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:26:06 -0700, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
wrote:

On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:41:01 -0500, David R. Birch wrote:
On 9/26/2010 8:01 PM, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:10:27 -0400, mysterion wrote:

Circumcision does no harm to the boy and will actually desensitise the
glans.

It most certainly DOES harm the boy.

If you don't believe me, just go ahead and cut the end of your dick off
and tell me it did no harm.

You don't seem to differentiate between removal of the prepuce and
amputation of the glans.

Removal of the prepuse essentially destroys the function of the glans, and
turne it into what might as well be scar tissue or callouses.

Nah! Not with all the lotion I give mine. wink, wink It's soft as
a baby's butt. (no connection) Ambidexterity has its advantages.


Are you mutilated? If so, are you envious of those of us who are whole?
There might be help for you:
http://www.cirp.org/pages/restore.html

BRACES for your DICK? What'll the yuppie bastids think of next?


LJ--mutilated, happy, and smegma-free

--
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.
--Jack London