On 27/09/2010 9:49 p.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Gib Bogle wrote:
On 27/09/2010 8:51 p.m., harry wrote:
On 27 Sep, 02:20, wrote:
On 26 Sep, 19:51, wrote:
ie Complete
********.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IsaM...eature=related
Gravity powered aircraft? As useful as a lead Zeppelin.
Never a mention of friction.
That's just the start of the reasons for infeasibility.
Actually its ultimately not infeasible, just impractical and inefficient.
From a cursory glance (it deserves no more) all it is conceptually, is a glider
and a balloon. Balloon lifts glider, glider glides to where it has to go.
The energy to turn a lighter than air volume of gas into a smaller compressed
volume that then acquires sufficient weight to act as a glider, is not mentioned.
The whole system is claimed to be self-sufficient. As I recall the compression
is powered by the propellers acting as turbines as the plane glides down. It's
perpetual motion.