On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:13:30 -0700, Smitty Two
wrote:

In article ,
Han wrote:

Jim Elbrecht wrote in
:

I thought Han's search abilities were lacking, but it doesn't even
come up on Wikipedia. DAGS must just be an a.h.r familiar acronym.
Google may be trying to push their LMGTFY feature-- or prefer we use
the more direct and forceful JFGI.g

Jim

Thanks Jim and Bob for the real insight
It's indeed funny that DAGS doesn't come up in google.

I don't google acronyms, I use www.acronymfinder.com.


Hrmphh- I'd swear Google used to return hits from there. DAGS *is*
there, so I think not. . . but then I Google
DAGS acronymfinder
-- and I get the acronymfinder page for DAG as #1- and no DAGS on the
first page. Weird.

Jim