On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:40:53 +0100, "Arfa Daily"
wrote:

All of the processing power is in those two BGAs Jeff.
(...)

Thanks for the details. I really don't know anything about such
dedicated game machines. I just assumed that all such machines used
common processors to make development easier.

That's a LOT of processing power, needing a lot of amps to perform ...

I found the Kill-o-watt meter and stuffed it in line with my Dell
Optiplex 960 (E8500 3.2Ghz). 43 watts at idle, 70 watts max when
playing a DVD (not including LCD monitor). Speedfan 4.40 says 31C for
both CPU cores after about an hour. The one large fan is barely
spinning and very quiet (which is why I bought this one). When I set
the fan to run full speed, it's quite loud.

The fan on these things *is* large, as is the heatsinking assembly, and when
the processor finally decides to ramp the fan up, it sounds like a vacuum
cleaner. For this reason, at idle they tend to run it at below what I would
consider a 'sensible' minimum, exacerbating the thermal stresses on the
chips, their (lead-free) soldering, and the board to which they are
attached.

Well, theory suggests that the life of a semiconductor device is
greatly affected by the number of thermal cycles it experiences
(thermal fatigue). I don't know if this also applies to CPU's or
whatever is in those BGA chips (FPGA/GPU?), but might be something
else to worry about. I would guess(tm) that the large aluminum heat
sink would moderate any abrupt changes in temperature, thus making it
less of a concern. However, that might not be the case for the solder
balls supporting the BGA.



--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558