On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:48:30 -0700, "azotic"
wrote:


"Sunworshipper" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:34:44 -0500, Sunworshipper
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:01:49 -0700, "azotic"
wrote:

New revenue stream for newspapers puts the squeez on bloggers.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...g-for-dollars/


Best Regards
Tom.


Copyright the press and sue if someone gets the message. Boston Globe
sues Philly newspaper for saying in the same words 'The British are
Coming'.

Bet ole grandma is still paying grease $ to the grandson cause he
found out about her partaking in the herb.

SW

http://www.gilligansisle.com/images/bobust.jpg

Oh no, a link with a picture of a newspaper article.

Sue them !

Oh no, their after me Ctrl C ...

SW

Pro Se ?

Best Regards
Tom.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

Who? Me? I wouldn't sue, unless they really deserved it. I think
the whole thing is silly and I'd be ashamed to extort $ with the treat
of going to court. That paper is all about $. They charge too much to
advertise, charge too much to buy it, use bait and switch tactics, and
must have to pay them to have them print a story (Sure seemed that way
to me after decades of reading it.) They have a win win win
(especially after getting rid of the Sun) situation and now they want
to extort $ through the pink tie dude, pathetic. They don't even let
you search past papers beyond something like a couple of days without
paying. No public service or gov't. watch dogging there.

Suppose my opinion is slander and I'm next. For some reason I just
feel like newspaper articles are the public domain, obviously not so
though.

SW