On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:29:44 -0700, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:29:23 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:39:08 -0700, Tim Wescott

There is no evidence at all that marijuana is physically addictive.

Don't tell the DEA that! They want you to believe otherwise.

However..unfortunately..there is wide spread evidence that pot is
pyschologically addictive.

My quesion remains, so what?

How, exactly, is it any skin off your nose if I become addicted?

If you are a driver, or a pilot, or a doctor, or someone with access to
deadly machinery...yes..it certainly is.

If I'm an addict, what difference does it make to you?

And most importantly, how do you rationalize spending billions of taxpayer
dollars to "rescue" me from a "problem" that exists only in your own mind?

Thanks,
Rich

Rich..Im not trying to rescue you. Im simply trying to stay alive, along
with my non drug using friends. Its bad enough having stoners and
tweakers driving cars..but double or triple the numbers of both..and it
will be really interesting for a while.

But you are indeed correct. This is a problem that has grown for a
century..and resolving it will not be clean, or neat.

Ill just make sure I get a nice big heavy SUV the day the laws are
removed. Maybe armor it a bit..I drive a lot. Put run flats on it....

Then Ill sell it 2 yrs later after all the ****heads are dead.

But you are indeed correct.

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch