View Single Post
  #37   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Jim Yanik Jim Yanik is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,103
Default Wal-Mart fights back

LSMFT wrote in
:

HeyBub wrote:
"The feds are complaining about getting dragged into court, having to
file time-consuming paperwork, and generally being treated like any
taxpayer who get crosswise with the IRS. "

"The federal agency claims its precious time is being eaten up by
Wal-Mart's legal maneuvers. Officials at the Department of Labor say
that, over the past five months, 17 percent of the available attorney
hours in its New York office have been devoted to this one little
case..."

http://townhall.com/columnists/PaulG...wal-mart_strik
es_back/page/full

I understand that Wal-Mart will NEVER settle a meritless
"slip-and-fall" case. They may lose money defending such a case but
their theory is that a vigorous defense against a single nuisance
suit deters 100 others.



Big corporations always use litigation to bankrupt their enemies.
Just what the constitution was crated for.



actually,the FEDGOV has essentially unlimited time,resources and
money(taxpayer money) to pursue lawsuits.
Corporations will usually take the path of lowest cost to them.


A company I worked for,Tektronix,fought from 1961 to 1971 on a patent
infringement case,where the Feds took Tek o'scope designs to other
companies and had them make copies of the scopes,and bought those instead
of from Tek.
They were copied all the way down to unused bolt holes in the chassis.

But they performed poorly compared to Tek originals.... :-)

So,I find it humorous that a FedGov employee is complaining about getting
dragged into court.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
localnet
dot com