Ned Simmons wrote:

On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 01:31:28 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:



The Republicans ran a candidate that Democrats said would be the same as
Bush and many Republicans were not that excited with "McSame" either.
Anyway, probably about 10% of Obama's vote was due to his libtardedness
and socialist ideas.

So, where did the other 90% come from?

Roger already explained that. "While this maybe true, Obama was voted
in because of Democratic lies and because of the color of his skin."

He's a mystery to me. He posts some of the goofiest stuff imaginable,
then manages to give coherent and knowledgeable advice about
industrial controls, a field I know something about and that, in order
to be successful, requires rational and logical reasoning.

Politics is totally irrational, at least for one party. I believe the term 'political
science' should take the cup in the category of oxymorons.

The other party, has issues also.


Wes