Zz Yzx wrote:
....

... based on what I've gleaned from the news reports.

Analysis:

1. To save time/$, they didn't ...

2. To save time/$, they "hung" ...

3. To save time/$, they used only ...

4. To save time/$, they used ...
....
I think we get the drift here.

I find it amazing that after spending multi-millions to bring in a
helluva a good-producing well, that apparently everyone thinks that at
that point the said "Since this is such a lucrative well that's going to
produce thousands of barrels of crude a day at a minimum of $75 or
$80/bbl, let's risk all that by seeing how shoddily we can now finish
off the work..."

Yeah, right...sounds like what would have happened to me...

--