On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:36:05 -0700, David Nebenzahl ǝʇoɹʍ:

On 6/13/2010 7:26 AM Meat Plow spake thus:

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:33:17 -0400, PeterD ǝʇoɹʍ:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:18:20 +0000, Meat Plow ??o??:

Xref: news sci.electronics.repair:528265 Path:
news.ecp.fr!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: Meat Plow
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: You want to know what I saw in this movie once Date: Sat,
12 Jun 2010 15:18:20 +0000 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines:
8 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host:
gR2qYcMGsRnx9m52PKV2dA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To:
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent:
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706)

There was this ... knife.

Aw poor wittle forger.

Shouldn't forge valid email addy.
Complaint fired off, bye bye account )

Zero chance AIOE will do one damned thing to the twit... After all,
that would be self-defeating to their purposes.

Heh... got email from AIOE this morning that the forger was blocked. My
guess is that the twit will reincarnate with my nick name but this time
using a munged email addy. I was a bit surprised that AIOE responded
this favorably. But it was the matter of forging an email address and
they couldn't really interpret it any other way unlike spam complaints
that have some head room where definition is the issue.

Thanks for your efforts at stopping them, but I don't think it worked.
There are some new posts here from them with timestamps later than this
message, showing aioe.org as the originator.

If they are forgeries then whoever is forged need only to send AIOE email
from the forged account demanding the forgeries stop. Just make sure it
is a forgery first. Nothing you can do if it isn't a forgery.