On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:01:17 -0500, flipper wrote:
[snip]
And an officer is certainly not 'trained' in every nuance of criminal
law. He makes a 'reasonable' determination but not a 'final
adjudication' or else there'd be no need for courts.
One problem I see is the State is not (explicitly anyway) authorized
to delegate powers beyond what's stated in SEC. 133.
That, btw, is what Arizona is trying to skirt by making it also a
'State crime' but, as I've already mentioned, I have problems with
that.
Don't really care if you have problems with that or not. Arizona is
becoming the seat of rebellion...
Next issue, if you can't speak English without an accent, you can't
teach "English as a Second Language" classes. Enforcement began
today.
Coming next, "Skin a Federale for Fun Day" :-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice
480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at
http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy