On Fri, 07 May 2010 23:36:13 -0700, Mark & Juanita
wrote:

wrote:

On May 7, 8:53Â*am, "J. Clarke" wrote:
On 5/7/2010 8:26 AM, HeyBub wrote:

Tim Daneliuk wrote:

Maybe. Â*But I have to tell you that this is a kind of inverted logic
when the victim of negligence/accident/poor judgment is somehow made
culpable. We're not talking about a rudder that got sheared because
it ran afoul
of some flotsam when a shrimper got too close to an oil rig. Â*We're
talking about an entire fishery being neutered. Â*By this line of
reasoning, I'm responsible for the drunk driver that hits me, the
unbalanced psycho that illegally uses a weapon to shoot me, or the
guy that cuts me off in traffic and causes me to roll my truck over
on the highway. Â*Your dog doesn't hunt.

Harrumph. You probably think that women who wear short skirts aren't
inviting rape.

So you would favor legislation that says that any woman raped while not
dressed in accordance with the hijab is at fault and the man who did it
should not be punished for accepting her obvious invitation?

You do realize that what you're saying is the straight Islamic party
line do you not?

Whooooosh!

Yeah, some people don't catch sarcasm very well, do they?

[Hint to the clueless -- HeyBub's comment did not in any way imply *he*
thinks that women wearing short skirts invite rape]

Some only will see what they want to see.