"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On May 6, 2:28 am, "Ed Huntress" wrote:

. At least, unless someone has come up with something
new. I didn't look for anything new. I realize their are fancy new
electronic controls, but I didn't think we were talking about them.
(There
are motors of this type that are not in space quadrature, either, but
that's
another subject.)


Now I'm finished being ****ed. We can just continue our usual arguments.
d8-)

--
Ed Huntress


Look back to the original post by Iggy which is really confusing. I
am not sure if the original post is talking about a new electronic
control for existing motors or a new electronic control for motors
designed to be used with the new control.

If you can figure out what the original quote is all about, you get a
medal. I think Iggy posted it as an example of extraordinarily poor
explanation and confusion, either scratching his head over it or being
facetious about it. Winston then made a poetic interpretation that was
quite original in itself. g


Not being a motor designer, I am unsure if there would be some cost
advantage to a design of a two phase motor with electronic speed
control over using a three phase motor with the existing variable
speed controls. I would have to run a bunch of numbers to see what
would be the least expensive way to have variable speed.

But in every case, I think the original post was about variable speed
using a two phase motor.

Well, it starts off saying "single-phase induction motor."

But with how confusing the original post is,
I could easily be wrong.

Dan

Again, you get a medal if you can figure it out. Ted Frater makes
beautiful medals. Maybe he'd make a Babblefish Award. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

The instructions were written by the people who write
credit card terms and conditions.

Best Regards
Tom


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---