Thread: What?
View Single Post
  #32   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Ed Huntress Ed Huntress is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,529
Default What?


wrote in message
...
On May 6, 2:28 am, "Ed Huntress" wrote:

.. At least, unless someone has come up with something
new. I didn't look for anything new. I realize their are fancy new
electronic controls, but I didn't think we were talking about them. (There
are motors of this type that are not in space quadrature, either, but
that's
another subject.)


Now I'm finished being ****ed. We can just continue our usual arguments.
d8-)

--
Ed Huntress



Look back to the original post by Iggy which is really confusing. I
am not sure if the original post is talking about a new electronic
control for existing motors or a new electronic control for motors
designed to be used with the new control.


If you can figure out what the original quote is all about, you get a medal.
I think Iggy posted it as an example of extraordinarily poor explanation and
confusion, either scratching his head over it or being facetious about it.
Winston then made a poetic interpretation that was quite original in itself.
g


Not being a motor designer, I am unsure if there would be some cost
advantage to a design of a two phase motor with electronic speed
control over using a three phase motor with the existing variable
speed controls. I would have to run a bunch of numbers to see what
would be the least expensive way to have variable speed.

But in every case, I think the original post was about variable speed
using a two phase motor.


Well, it starts off saying "single-phase induction motor."

But with how confusing the original post is,
I could easily be wrong.

Dan


Again, you get a medal if you can figure it out. Ted Frater makes beautiful
medals. Maybe he'd make a Babblefish Award. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress