On Apr 25, 9:13 pm, "Buerste" wrote:
...

Your "scientists" use lies and data manipulation for political agendas.
REAL science uses the "Scientific Method". Your "scientists" can't actually
prove anything so you have it backwards claiming that others must DISPROVE
it.

I agree.
When those with other theories are called "deniers", it is not
science.
Maybe political "science".

When politicians, who could not do the partial derivatives in
Atmospheric Sciences 301, state, "The time for debate is over.", then
it is not science.

It is more like when Stalin, then considered by Soviets to be the
greatest scientist who ever lived, was having wheat seeds taught to
grow further North.

"The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the
World’s Top Climate Scientists", 2010 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
That guy is on a book tour, and he says that no one is ever going to
admit they were wrong about being a global warming alarmist.
He claims the issue will quietly die away.
I suspect he is right.
Global warming alarmism can be swept under the rug as long as
collectivists run the media and individualist scientists are second
class citizens.

I remember the 50's and how I was taught we needed bomb shelters.
I remember the 60s and how I was taught about all the LSD chromosome
damaged babies we were going to have.
I remember the 70's and how I was taught that 20% of the world's
population would be dead from pollution and we would be out of fossil
fuel by 2000.
I remember the 80's and how I heard on the TV that the hole in the
ozone was going to give us skin cancer.
I remember the 90's and how I heard on the TV that any kid that walked
home from school would be kidnapped.