"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:57:18 -0500, "Paul K. Dickman"
wrote:


"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:50:48 -0500, "Paul K. Dickman"
wrote:


Of all the references claiming that he got the page drunk, 99% of them
are
from windbags like you posting on forums.

It's put up or shut up time, Gunner.

If you have any credible evidence of a criminal act worse than letting
someone one year under the drinking age have a cosmopolitan, let's see
it
now.

Your spew and denial is once again noted with amusement.

Gunner


That's what I thought, Gunner.
You've got diddly squat.


So Comrade..you believe its ok for an adult to get a 16yr old drunk and
then **** him in the ass?


The page was 17 not 16. That is just gunners random alteration of the facts.

This is typical of gunner's dubious debating technique.
Gunner himself said the page was 17 when he started this discussion.



That sounds suprisingly close to paedophilia.

Dont have neighbor kids close by...do you?

Gunner

Now were back to mud slinging.
Again, this is typical of gunner's dubious debating technique.

Paul K. Dickman