View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Hawke[_3_] Hawke[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,024
Default "We found them squeaky clean"


Hawke wrote:

That is what the Royal Society panel assigned to look into the climate
researchers supposedly guilty of lying about climate change found after
looking into the matter. "Climategate" as it was called has been found
to be no more valid than "whitewater" was. The only thing the scientists
were guilty of was sloppy record keeping but not bad science.

Sloppy record keeping IS bad science.


Have Parakeet tell that to, um...(oh, who's the guy at CRU who stepped
down?) Phil Jones, who admitted to manipulating (falsifying) climate
data. "Lost" is data supporting CRU theories of global warming. Who
could have guessed that might happen? He's no scientist; he's a
freakin' politician who got caught and AFAIK, isn't in prison for it,
either.

---


Take it easy on poor Hawke, his Socialist Utopia is already kaput. His
liberul politicians are destine to lose the House, Senate, Governors, Mayors
and Dog Catchers. AND his climate scam has been exposed to the world and
those idiots are nothing more than comic relief. So, he's doubled-up on his
anti-depressants and "mood enhancers". THEN, he knows all the socialist
damage his heroes have done will be quickly reversed after November.



I know you right wingers like to pretend a lot. Like you pretend you are
rational, unemotional, logical, and go strictly by facts. But the truth
is a bit different. All I did was report what an article in the April
15th edition of the Sacramento Bee printed. So there is the citation.
Nothing I said was my opinion just what was reported in the newspaper
article. But you attack the messenger rather than for even one minute
question whether your views on the "climategate" story are right. So
your belief is all based on emotion. When presented with facts like I
did you still cling stubbornly to your original beliefs. Now it's
looking like there was nothing wrong with the conclusions of the
scientists but all you do is attack me and refuse to reexamine your own
views on the subject. Why should you though? You're so very good at
pretending.

You're also doing some more pretending when it comes to you thinking the
republicans are going to be in any position to reverse anything Obama
has done. I'll be there to remind you of that when you are disappointed
by the minimal gains the republicans make in Nov. Things are starting to
get too good for the republicans to benefit. By November nobody but
right wingers will want them back in office.

Hawke