On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:08:00 +1000, "Phil Allison"
wrote:

You can't explain why a digital scope is not usable for analog work.

** Never said they were "unusable for analog work"
You sure are ONE vile ****ing LIAR !!!

Message-ID:
"Digital scopes absolutely SUCK for audio work."

Unless someone forged your signature, those are your words. I
substituted "unusable" for "SUCK" because my proof reader doesn't like
profanity.

I realize that you disagree with literally everything I could possibly
offer about analog versus digital scopes. So, instead of arguing in
favor of digital (which is my preferred position), I supplied several
reasons why an analog scope is superior to digital for audio testing,
thus providing you with at least a foundation to build upon. All you
had to do was agree and expand upon what I posted. I was genuinely
interested in WHY you thought digital scopes were unsuitable for audio
testing and troubleshooting. Instead, all you could do is spew
profanity and insults. I appreciate the benefits of your attention,
but I'm more interested in the technology than your exercise of
elementary skool language skills.

So, I'll try again... Why do you think digital scopes absolutely SUCK
for audio work?


--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558