Joseph Gwinn wrote:
In article ,
"John R. Carroll" wrote:

Joseph Gwinn wrote:
In article ,
"John R. Carroll" wrote:

Joseph Gwinn wrote:
In article ,
Wes wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote:

Sort of.
Even back in the day a convicted felon was generally not waived.
Nipped in the bud is one thing. That isn't what we are seeing at
present.

Well. I recall some pretty bad ones, but yes the authorities were
trying to nip it in the bud. And it more often than not worked.

Had to laugh a little at that one.
Basic has a way of sorting out big shooters.
LOL

--
John R. Carroll