On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:20:43 -0400, the infamous "J. Clarke"
scrawled the following:

On 3/24/2010 10:29 PM, Phisherman wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:26:01 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:04:29 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

You're not allowed to be uninsured anymore. They can confiscate your
property for that now.

Absolutely nothing new there. It's just a different sort of tax,
similar to the confiscation ability your IRS has had and used for
many, many years. Feeble attempt to make it sound like something new
and different.


I understand that you can pay the IRS a fine instead of buying
insurance. The bill requires additional IRS operations to check if
all is covered and that all people are controlled on a monthly basis.
Look on the bright side: The bonus is the it doubles as a simulus bill
too, more IRS agent jobs are created.

Upscale's problem is that he does not understand that purchasing a
product from a business is not a tax.

Nor does he understand that adding to the gov't roles is a greater
burden on society rather than a benefit.


Let's see, 16k x $50k/yr = $800,000,000 taken right out of the
healthcare system by bean counters, ant that's just the first line of
bureaucracy. There are HOW many _brand_new_ agencies being created
for this happy horse****? 159?
http://forum.starnewsonline.com/view...6&t=332&p=3766

Yeah, his plan will work just fine, cutting costs and increasing
services to the people. Uh huh. In a @#$%^& pig's eye! This new
thing is a total cluster**** if I ever heard of one.

Care to comment on his economics, Uppy?

--
If we attend continually and promptly to the little that we can do, we
shall ere long be surprised to find how little remains that we cannot do.
-- Samuel Butler