Han wrote:

Mark & Juanita wrote in
m:

No, unfortunately. Just confirms what many of us knew before the
election
but too many people were just too blinded by skin color to see it.

Since when has bungling the economy, financial regulation, and war
anything
to do with skin color? You are against black people becoming involved in
politics, or am I misunderstanding?

You are completely misunderstanding me. It is no secret that a great
number of people voted for the current president *because* of his skin color
and that his opponent was afraid to call him out on his past associations,
lack of record, and past statements for fear of being called racist. I
personally don't care what the color of a person's skin is, I want to know
what they stand for, their core beliefs, and their commitment to the country
they are wanting to lead. I'd vote for somebody like Walter E. Williams in
a heartbeat. Not because of his color, but because I know he loves this
country and recognized the exceptionalism that is possible by unleashing a
free people to pursue their own dreams and destiny with minimal interference
by government.



For the record: not only the last previous administration is guilty on
many fronts (although the worst happened during their term(s)), quite a
number before were guilty too. And personal and corporate responsibility
should include an enforcement mechanism.


--

There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage

Rob Leatham