On Mar 19, 11:29*am, "h" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:42:11 -0400, "h"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:15:05 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote:

Even the construction of your 'box' shows it wasn't. *Clearly covered
with the same stuff as the baloon and thus too flimsy to hold
_anything_ heavier than a few pounds and that would ahve to be spread
out.

Harry K

Oh, damn! Looks like you are COMPLETELY WRONG!

http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/e...ent/uploads/20....

He can't spell "baloon", so why would he know anything about how they're
made?

I don't generally worry about typo's on usenet.

Shrug. If you make the same typo 50 times, it's not a "typo". And the plural
of "typo" is "typos", not "typo's", which is the possessive. Yes, as a
matter of fact I did used to teach English. *- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So in addition to proving you are a pedantic prick you also prove
that:

a. You can't count.
b. You don't know the difference between a possesive and a
contraction.

Harry K