On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:14:16 -0800, the infamous "anorton"
scrawled the following:


"Joseph Gwinn" wrote in message
...
The "settled science" of Global Warming has become unsettled.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB2000...07774168722660
2.html

The Wall Street Journal, 22 February 2010.

Joe Gwinn

Think a bit about what this means. Everyone knows the UN is a political not
a scientific organization. The compiled UN report of several thousand pages
has been subjected to most intense scrutiny that could be bought by OPEC and
the coal, oil, gas industries, yet they have found less than a handful of
errors or exaggerations.

Man, where'd you find -that- tanker truckful of Koolaid?


They have found nothing wrong with the hundreds of
other remaining conclusions.

How does one refute all those "may"s, "might"s, or "could lead to"s,
hmmm? The UN pols weren't even sure enough to say "WILL".


The few errors have to do with specific
effects of climate change in certain areas. None have to do with the
fundamental conclusion that CO2 from fossil fuel is significantly warming
the Earth.

Except the proof. Nothing anywhere proves it, and most of that source
data was tainted by CRU. Even their old leader admitted that. Where
have you been, Norty?


--snip--

Of course the truth becomes plainly obvious eventually,

Then why the hell haven't -you- stumbled across it yet? Keeriste!


but this strategy allows the perpetrators to extract the
maximum profit from their current product. Most scientists (even the
technocrats at the UN) are not professional lobbyists and do not know how to
respond to such an organized attack.

The Wall Street Journal used to be a responsible voice of conservatism until
it was bought by Rupert Murdoch (with a Saudi prince as second largest share
holder).

Back to the old "the oil company owns it" ploy, are you? sigh

It still isn't too late to BAFC, idiot.

--
"Just think of the tragedy of teaching children not to doubt."
-- Clarence Darrow