dennis@home wrote:
"PM" wrote in message
...
Man at B&Q wrote:
On Feb 18, 12:22 pm, Andrew May wrote:
Man at B&Q wrote:
On Feb 18, 11:38 am, Grimly Curmudgeon

wrote:
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when
the drugs began to take hold. I remember "dennis@home"
saying something like:

The poster didn't actually say his old MoT had run out, did he?
You can get a vehicle MoTd as often as you like.
Its still an un-roadworthy car if it fails, or did you miss
that?
No, it's not necessarily.
You ought to learn the difference between 'unroadworthy' and 'MoT
failure'.

Suggest you look at the response from VOSA
onhttp://www.mottest.net/mot/mot-failure-question/

But that doesn't explain the situation where the failure does not
make the car unroadworthy.

What situation is that? Read the quote again. An MOT failure is
unroadworthy by definition.

Not all MOT checks are safety related.

The only ones that might not be are emissions tests, but even they
could be safety related depending on your views.
I don't see anything else that isn't directly related to safety in
car MOTs.

How about a mis-spaced number plate?