tim....
wibbled on Saturday 13 February 2010 16:01


On what grounds one wonders. The result is based upon a ruling that "the
building work isn't complete until the surrounding cover is removed".

Dunno - maybe he's going to try a completely different tack to try to render
the technicalities of the last argument null and void?

The EU court isn't going to waste its time hearing arguements about that.

No, but I'm sure between a couple of baristers that this could spin out for
another few years whilst he enjoys his "castle". You can do this stuff if
you're rich...

Might have been cheaper though to move to a decent country and find a plot
of land where he could have done this legally...

--
Tim Watts

Managers, politicians and environmentalists: Nature's carbon buffer.