cavelamb wrote:
Ed Huntress wrote:
"cavelamb" wrote in message
news
LMFAO
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stefan..._b_452458.html

It was funny. What was especially funny is that all she had on her
hand was a few words about three core subject areas (apparently for
the Q&A period; she spoke from prepared notes). If she needs a
prompt to remember them, then wha??

Oh, well. This is a nutty thing going on with the Tea Party and
Sarah Palin. I'm trying to back away from it emotionally and just
look at the phenomenon itself. Populist anger is good; Jefferson was
right about that. One hopes that the phenomenon follows the rest of
his prescription: that they figure out what it is they want, and how
to accomplish it. That's where the Tea Party is going to run into
trouble. They're going to find out about the law of unintended
consequences.

I doubt it, Ed.
the playing field has become entirely too complex.

What do you think will happen?



I have no idea, Ed.
But I'd suspect more smoke and mirrors.





And CITI bank will lead us out of this darkness!

(yee haw!)

--

Richard Lamb
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb/