In article , Upscale wrote:
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:50:24 GMT, (Doug Miller)
wrote:
And so, you must also be fine with addicts stealing and destroying
families to feed their habits, just as long as it doesn't affect you.

Quite the selfish outlook you have there Doug.

Quite the set of assumptions you've made there. And with so little basis, too.

It's assumptions based entirely on your stating you don't care what
addicts do. Your exact words. As usual, you fail to justify those
words.

Liar. I did not say that. You claim those are my "exact words" -- fine. Quote
the post where I supposedly wrote that, or retract your lie.

Just how exactly do you think addicts feed their habits? Where do they
get the money to buy their drugs?

Had you stopped to consider that the price would likely be much lower if the
drugs could be obtained legally? How many people need to steal to support an
alcohol or tobacco habit?

How exactly do the actions of
addicts leave their familys unaffected?

If an addict's actions are affecting his family, isn't it *their* job to do
something about it?

You like making all sorts of grandiose statements, but then you
continually fall flat on your face in your attempt to justify those
statements.

Oh, and you didn't just fall flat on your face by claiming my "exact words"
were something I never said?

In other words, as usual, you're full of ****. It's quite apparent you
base your ridiculous statements on your need to see your comments in
print. Quite the sad little world you live in.

I'm quite content with the world I live in -- in stark contrast to yours,
where you need to deliberately distort the words and positions of those with
whom you disagree, in order to justify your own.