On 2/1/2010 10:50 AM, dpb wrote:
Han wrote:
Mark & Juanita wrote in
m:
Put in a different way -- CO2 only absorbs energy in specific
wavelengths of light (think of it as a filter the CO2 absorbs light
in certain wavelengths and does not affect other wavelengths, letting
that energy
pass through with no impact). At some point, the maximum absorption
in those wavelengths is reached and all of the energy in those narrow
bands is being absorbed. Thereafter, it doesn't matter how much
additional CO2 you pump into the system, no additional energy in those
wavebands can be absorbed and CO2 has zero impact in other wavelengths
of light.

Should be true if all light of that wavelength has been absorbed.
Don't know if and when that would happen. There might be very much
light of those wavelengths, more than crrently or in the near future
would be absorbed.

Measurements indicate that at the current concentration level of CO2
there's already only a small differential--hence, the emphasis on CO2
seems misplaced as far as changes making any significant difference
(either way).


AccuWeather's Joe *******i made a pretty good argument last week that
the CO2 AGW adherents may be shooting themselves in the foot.

FRIDAY 11 PM LONDON TIME "A THEORY ON WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE CLIMATE
MODELS."

http://www.accuweather.com/ukie/bast...urope-blog.asp

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)