Hey Bruce, ring wiring
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:32:27 -0800, jk wrote:
Ned Simmons wrote:
O
I suppose you could argue that they're not physically parallel, but
the parenthetical at the end of 310.4(A) anticipates that quibble when
it says, "parallel (electrically joined at both ends)." Or do you
have something else in mind?
I would argue that in the sense that the code means, there is only 1
end.
You could also say it's a loop so there are *no* ends. But I
personally don't have the crust to have that conversation with the
code inspector. g
--
Ned Simmons
|