DGDevin wrote:
"Dave Balderstone" wrote in message
news:230120101720552720%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderst one.ca...


The people who are questioning AGW aren't making a f*king DIME.

Horsecrap, some of them have been or are continuing to be funded by
the fossil fuel industries, Richard Lindzen being a good example. He's not
only been supported directly by OPEC and energy companies,
he works with organizations that get funding from companies like
ExxonMobil. It amazes me how some people who like to imagine they
are informed on this issue somehow manage to miss that and claim the
$$$ motive is all on the other side. Well it doesn't really amaze
me, it's actually quite predictable.

You are quite possibly correct. Given the choice of results coming from
entities funded by private enterprise or the public largess, who should I
believe?

Hmmm. Each has their "experts," so the decision must be based on other
factors.

One group creates wealth, the other destroys it. One group stands to make
money and employ people, the other promotes feeling good. One allows the
"invisible hand" to determine progress, the other uses "consensus."

Let me think...