"A.Lee" wrote in message
...
dennis@home wrote:

"A.Lee" wrote in message ..

No one is denying he is/was a criminal.
It was not 'an unlicensable weapon'.
Tony Martin did not have the relevant certificate, so could not keep a
gun.
The relevant gun could be held by anyone else with either a shotgun
cert. or firearms cert. depending on what model the shotgun is.

So lets get the right.. you don't know what model of shotgun he had but
you
state it was licensable.

Are you really stupid, or just putting on a show?
Yes, any shotgun is licensable[1].
Certain shotguns need a Class 1 Firearms certificate, the vast majority
need a Shotgun Certificate.
Is that clear enough?

Alan.

[1] So long as it meets certain rules, such as having a length of over
24" etc.

So without knowing what model it is and how many shots it can fire before
reloading you claim its licensable?
I suppose you will also state that machine guns are licensable provided they
meet certain rules (like not being a machine gun).
We are talking about the UK here BTW.