On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:49:55 -0600, the infamous Swingman
scrawled the following:

On 1/24/2010 9:31 AM, Dave Balderstone wrote:
In articleQKadnaRCEurIxsHWnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@giganews. com, Swingman
wrote:

Still looking for refutation that the three links in my first two posts
are false, made up, and wrong ... thus far nothing but smear tactics and
shooting at the messengers.

A few more links:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ientists-says-
knew-data-verified.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6999975.ece

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7000063.ece

The bull**** from the IPCC just keeps getting deeper...


Although practical by nature and wise to the ways of the world after
almost 70 years of living in it, I am indeed guilty of cherishing some
idealistic principles when in comes to empirical science and its
principle of observation.

Yeah, I think we've all been sucked in a time or two. Most of us also
reopen our eyes shortly after that and make up for the slip.


An endeavor with even the appearance of being based on lies and/or
distortion, no matter how slight, will do NOTHING to advance humankind
toward a goal of living in harmony on this planet.

These known distortions will, however, cost trillions of dollars and
redirect monies which could have saved lives of the most
poverty-stricken people, and they have already killed some.


I really would like some convincing evidence that the "scientific
methods" I learned many years ago in college, said methods having
brought indisputable advancement for human good, are NOT being subverted
to the extent suspected in this religiopolitical AGW issue by greed and
political agendizing!

Sadly, I wouldn't hold my breath, Swingy.


We, as humans, and in order to move forward, have a desperate need to
get to the bottom of the appearance of impropriety in ANY application of
"science" toward the human condition.

Verily. I feel so sorry for reputation science is getting right now.


IMO, there should be _NOTHING BUT_ *skepticism* until this issue is laid
to rest, one way or the other.

Damn Tootin'!


End of story ...

Surely the alarmists won't let that alone...

---
"Some of us are wondering if we have created a monster."
Kevin Vranes, climate scientist, University of Colorado
talking about global warming hysteria, January, 2007.